Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Open Societies and Spontaneous Orders by Richard M. Ebeling

[The following is a review of Popper, Hayek and the Open Society by Calvin Hayes (London/New York: Routledge, 2009) 284 pp. $150. It originally appeared in Freedom Daily (January 2012) published by The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Virginia.]


Friedrich A. Hayek and Karl Popper were two of the most influential and internationally recognized critics of totalitarian collectivism in the twentieth century. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom (1944) and Popper's The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945) helped change the intellectual climate at a time when it was presumed that various forms of socialism soon would completely triumph over limited government, free markets, and individual freedom.


Both Hayek and Popper were Austrians by birth, almost the same age, and graduated with doctoral degrees from the University of Vienna in the 1920s. But they never knew each other, even in the relatively small and interconnected intellectual circles of interwar Vienna.


Hayek left Austria in 1931 for a teaching position at the London School of Economics, and only heard about Popper when his fellow Austrian economist, Gottfried Haberler, suggested in 1935 that he read Popper’s recently published book, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. With the darkening clouds of Nazism over Central Europe, Popper left Austria in 1937 for a teaching position in New Zealand. After corresponding during the Second World War, Hayek helped arrange a teaching position for Popper at the London School of Economics, as well.


In The Road to Serfdom, Hayek tried to show how the rise of socialist ideas in late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries Germany had prepared the political and economic foundations for the Nazi rise to power in the 1930s; and how similar socialist trends in Great Britain and the United States might, likewise, threaten those countries with political and economic tyranny.


Popper’s Open Society and Its Enemies traced the origins of collectivist despotism to its ancient philosophical roots in the writings of Plato, who Popper considered to be the intellectual father of both communism and fascism. He also argued that Marx’s materialistic determinism closed the door to any political system of freedom.


Calvin Hayes’ recent book, Popper, Hayek and the Open Society analyzes what he sees as the strengths and weaknesses of their respective defenses of human freedom. Popper and Hayek, each in his own way, made a case for liberty on the basis of the limits of man’s knowledge.



Karl Popper and the Fallibility of Human Knowledge

In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, Hayes explains, Popper became disillusioned with his earlier attraction to Marxism. What bothered him was the fact that no matter what happened, the cleaver Marxist theoretician always seemed to be able to show that it “confirmed” and “proved” Marx ‘s predictions of the coming collapse of capitalism to be correct.


He also was bothered by some of the, then, current trends in the philosophy of science that argued that the truth of a hypothesis was corroborated by the method of verification. That is, the more times a hypothesis passes the rigor of scientific testing, the more we can be confident that it is correct.


In The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934) and Conjectures and Refutations (1963) Popper reasoned that no matter how many white swans one may search for and see, this in itself does not prove the hypothesis that all swans are white. The discovery of one black swan would prove the hypothesis to be wrong. Hence, the proper scientific method should be based on the construction of conjectures that are open to refutation and falsification.This, he said, should be considered the benchmark of intellectual integrity and honesty.


Such a view, by necessity, must result in us accepting the fact that all of our knowledge and beliefs are tentative and, in principle, open to being proven wrong or less than fully correct at some point in the future. Indeed, in his essays on The Poverty of Historicism, Popper had argued that predicting the future was logically impossible.


If we make one reasonable assumption, that human knowledge grows over time, then there is no way for any human being to successfully predict the future, since that would require him to know "today" that which he will only learn, discover, and know "tomorrow." You cannot already have "tomorrow's" knowledge "today," (otherwise it would already be part of "today's" knowledge). Hence, you cannot fully know what you or others may do that ends up shaping the future, because that will partly depend upon knowledge that is only acquired over the process of time.


The “open society,” Popper reasoned, must be one that allows for error, reconsideration, and a multitude of minds at work in the pursuit of always potentially fallible knowledge. The collectivist social engineers, Popper insisted, suffered from an arrogance of presuming to know the truth required to reconstruct society “according to plan,” with little thought that their conceptions of a “good,” or “just,” or “perfect” society might be flawed or incorrect.


Friedrich Hayek and the Decentralized Knowledge of Society

Hayek’s focus in essays collected in Individualism and Economic Order (1948) and The Counter-Counter Revolution of Science (1955), and in his two master political works, The Constitution of Liberty (1960) and Law, Legislation, and Liberty, 3 vols. (1976-1979), was the fact that matching society’s division of labor is an inescapable division of knowledge. Hayes summarizes Hayek’s argument that human knowledge is multi-layered, often difficult to measure or fully articulate, and dispersed among the members of humanity in a way that cannot be collected, integrated or coordinated even by “the best and the brightest” of human minds.


Hayek concluded the only successful manner in which all this knowledge can be brought to bear so all in society might benefit and take advantage of all that other human beings know and can effectively apply in productive ways is to coordinate their actions through the competitive price system of an open, and functioning market economy. This, Hayek insisted, is why socialist central planning is inherently unworkable.


The Role of Tradition in Science and Society

Hayes also emphasizes that both Popper and Hayek considered that it is impossible to understand or analyze either natural or social phenomena without taking some aspects of the existing order as “given.” These serve as the starting points for studying nature or society. Thus, both of them argued that science and the study of society could not do without some sense of intellectual and cultural “tradition.” In the study of nature, this is the “taken-for-granted” theories and hypotheses of science that form the starting points for critical investigations, including any new conjectures and attempted refutations challenging parts of the existing body of scientific knowledge.


Societal traditions Hayek argued, represent the cumulative experience and wisdom of countless generations, out of which have evolved the “rules” and patterns of human association. They incorporate more knowledge than any one man or one generation could ever know or understand. They form the basis of the foundational elements of the “spontaneous order” of society, in the context of which each new generation lives, acts, thinks and innovatively changes things in incremental ways that transform those human institutions, but often in a manner that only will be appreciated or fully understood long after those changes have been at work.


The Limits of Human Knowledge and the Case for Freedom

A central element to Calvin Hayes’ analysis of Popper and Hayek is to ask how a “positive” case can be made for limits on government control, intervention, or redistribution on what are primarily “negative” arguments about the limits of human knowledge, in the way that both Popper and Hayek basically presented their defenses of freedom.


Hayes suggests that if it can be shown that these limits on human knowledge and knowing are inescapable to the human condition, then it might be justifiable to reason from an “is” to an “ought.” If, as Popper insisted, it is a fact that man cannot be certain of what he may learn tomorrow that might falsify what he believes today, then it would be wrong to replace an “open society” with a “closed” one that imposed a single totalitarian plan on society, under the presumption that some can know enough today to centrally direct everyone’s lives into the future.


And if, as Hayek strongly argued, society is a “spontaneous order” that no one with their inescapably limited, individual knowledge, can ever fully understand or successfully redesign without leaving out much of the knowledge possessed by others that the planner can never hope to know or appreciate, then it would wrong to impose economic central plans or try to redistribute wealth according to some presumed God-like wisdom and knowledge of what would be “fair” in terms of some standard of each receiving their “just rewards” from a paternalistic government.


Thus, Hayes concludes, “negative” insights into the inherent limits of man and his mind, may provide a “positive” case for political and constitutional restrictions on the powers, duties and responsibilities of governments. And it may show, even more strongly, how insightful and important Popper and Hayek have been in the modern battle of ideas over freedom versus force in society.

42 comments:

  1. Thanks for the history lesson. Am I correct in assuming, then, that Popper's work is the original source for references to the proverbial "black swan"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice review! It sounds like a good book. Kudos to Hayes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great work on connecting these two convergent thinkers, Popper being a philosopher whom many libertians fail to appreciate. An added points of interest, one you probably already know: Popper attended the first Mont Pelerin Society meetings; Popper also wrote a number of letters to Hayek during the peroid of membership in the Society, his _Refutations and Conjectures_ being dedicated to Hayek.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it would wrong to impose economic central plans or try to redistribute wealth!
      Want to make your children more beautiful? Just search for thegirls dress up Game,you will find millions and millions of model copies to choose from as many parents or girls would have posted the same to help you out.even winx club games can help you ,too,those girls wear different clothes letting your child learn.

      Delete
  4. In Nov. 2009, Eberling wrote an excellent article on Free Enterprise. Can anyone give me the sources for his blog. I would love to read the original documents.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice article.. keep posting such updates and keep the visitors update....

    Thanks


    Generic Abilify

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well this form of information is really value in look for of, efficient information for guests and a value for you as will definitely screen the excellent of the writer. It’s fantastic to have these kinds of articles around to keep information movement constant. Helping those who really can create elements right later on, fantastic work!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Greetings!
    Who goes that extra mile nowadays? Well Done! I am surely going to tweet this awesome post.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey
    Open Societies and Spontaneous Orders by Richard M. Ebeling
    Excellent job! Thanks for the news, that's powerful! I appreciate your post, Bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rare story lesson, i was searching for this for my school history papers. Will visit soon.
    Computer Store

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hayek’s focus in essays collected in Individualism and Economic Order (1948) and The Counter-Revolution of Science (1955), and in his two master political works, The Constitution of Liberty (1960) and Law, Legislation, and Liberty, (in three volumes, 1976-1979), was the fact that matching society’s division of labor is an inescapable division of knowledge. Hayes summarizes Hayek’s argument that human knowledge is multi-layered, often difficult to measure or fully articulate, and dispersed among the members of humanity in a way that cannot be collected, integrated, or coordinated even by “the best and the brightest” of human minds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. funny articl.i love it very much.thanks saw this page bookmarked and very much liked what I read. I will surely bookmark it as well and also go through your other posts tonight.Thanks for you sharing!
      Everyone's childhood is always associated with her beautiful doll, so cute right? My little girlfriend always play Cat Game when I visit her,especially,before she could reach school age,she like to school Game so much,it is simple and she can learn how to make up to be a school girl!

      Delete
  11. Ich habe gelesen es ihr post schön mit perfekt wissen und mit Lesezeichen versehen Sie es mit meinen Freunden, die ihn mögen

    german to english translation


    http://germantoenglishtranslation.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  12. This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
    http://www.helpwithassignment.com/

    ReplyDelete
  13. post provide excellent information with perfect knowledege i will bookmark and share it with my friends

    mgt 311 final exam

    <a href="www.examquestionson.blogspot.com/
    >exam questions on</a>


    www.examquestionson.blogspot.com

    www.slideshare.net/moonacademy2/mgt-311-final-exam-14457728


    ReplyDelete
  14. solved answer of mkt 421 final exam, eco 372 final exam, mgt 311 final exam, fin 370 final exam, eco 365 final exam, mgt 230 final exam

    http://solvedanswer.blogspot.com/

    solved answer

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am very amazed now to red out the differential behaviors of human societies....The role of tradition in Science and technology is defined in a great way and the whole article is highly knowledgeable...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of the most amazing things about the online food game is that they cost you nothing at all, also no matter how many times you wish to play a shopping game, you can simply get online and play it without worrying about money.Also if you don’t know how to take care your baby as a young mother, you can play baby dress up Games online,too!

      Delete
  16. post excellent information about i like it and bookmark it share with friends

    money sending

    http://moneysending.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wonderful post! Youve made some very astute observations and I am thankful for the the effort you have put into your writing. Its clear that you know what you are talking about. I am looking forward to reading more of your sites content.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Regards and good luck Bloggers like you are very few on World Wide Web and I am happy to found you. It’s like finding a pearl in the sea, tough but fruitful. Best wishes and regards.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is a great post, and a great topic to explore. Thanks for sharing for earn gain

    ReplyDelete
  20. I achieve it, it's accessible for everyone! Pretty! please add something more? all tech fair

    ReplyDelete
  21. we are the best herbal incense online wholesaler and we have been dealing in Herbal incense online sale from last 10 years. we can provide you excellent quality of Herbal incense and spice incense. Herbal Incense is legal in all states and you will surely enjoy it.

    ReplyDelete
  22. He also was bothered by some of the, then, current trends in the philosophy of science that argued that the truth of a hypothesis was corroborated by the method of verification. That is, the more times a hypothesis passes the rigor of scientific testing, the more we can be confident that it is correct.


    ReplyDelete
  23. The act of penance or satisfaction that the priest imposes helps the penitent to overcome selfishness, to desire more strongly to live a holy life, to be closer to Jesus, and to show to others the love and compassion of Jesus. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Rather fascinating internet page, as a consequence of the writer, this lady has layed out similar as well as adaptable plans which were for people.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Looking forward to ones more details posted within this, deliver that you present, probably eventually a person or your buddies incorporate the use of.Home page

    ReplyDelete
  26. Excellent understand personally, This is just what We needed. Cheers regarding expressing this excellent write-up! That's very intriguing Smile I like reading in addition to We are always trying to find beneficial information similar to this! to visit on Dymo labels online free of cost

    ReplyDelete
  27. it is a fact that man cannot be certain of what he may learn tomorrow that might falsify what he believes today, then it would be wrong to replace an
    League of Legends Boost
    League of Legends Elo Boost

    ReplyDelete
  28. I want a beeware sign that's just such a cute idea! Didn't know that they couldn't tell each other about things close to the hive. I'll have to ask hubby if he knew that.

    Visit ranch supply!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous said...great, now lets blow this whole thing out of proportion CO, i am sure that 90% of your readers will be on board. Green Passport

    ReplyDelete
  30. And it may show, even more strongly, how insightful and important Popper and Hayek have been in the modern battle of ideas over freedom versus force in society. Cheap LOL Boost
    Cheap LOL Elo Boost

    ReplyDelete
  31. Superb write-up I really like your own write-up; adore the way you identified everything, you are doing a fantastic task many of some others that you by means of of which kind of educational blogs produce recognition to be able to us all linked to many points. My spouse and i read other sorts of exciting blogs from the web sites in addition to I will be a whole lot interested using your blogging and site-building expertise, When i furthermore did start to compose post and this also sort conversation actually support everyone out there. We by now bookmarked ones web site and discussed the internet sites for you to my personal co-workers not only everyone yet every one of them just like your own blogs expertise, trust you generate more intriguing information sites this way one particular and good luck for the upcoming websites.

    Jimmy Wilson-Black Velvet Jewelry Gift Boxes

    ReplyDelete
  32. This can be a great sound judgment post. Worthwhile one who is merely seeking the means relating to this element. It's going to undoubtedly help teach me personally. Betty Hall

    ReplyDelete
  33. I need any beware sign that is certainly merely a really cute idea! Didn't understand that that they could hardly tell 1 another in relation to points towards Puppy training books the hive. We'll should ask man in case he / she realized in which.

    ReplyDelete
  34. it's true that will male can't be specific associated with what wholesale Green Coffee Bean Extract exactly he might discover down the road that may falsify what exactly they believes nowadays,

    ReplyDelete
  35. Worthwhile one who is merely seeking the means relating to this element. It's going to undoubtedly help teach me personally.

    ReplyDelete
  36. HMM h habe gelesen es ihr post schön mit perfekt wissen und mit Lesezeichen versehen Sie es mit meinen Freunden, die ihn mögen

    ReplyDelete
  37. I got an overview about the fallibility of human knowledge and the role of tradition in society and science.. Really great work. thanks.. BUS 475 Final Exam

    ReplyDelete